Improved performance benchmarks and usage docs

This commit is contained in:
Lovell Fuller
2013-08-26 16:10:48 +01:00
parent 9ba9b95648
commit b836704451
3 changed files with 82 additions and 46 deletions

View File

@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ The typical use case for this high performance Node.js module is to convert a la
It is somewhat opinionated in that it only deals with JPEG images, always obeys the requested dimensions by either cropping or embedding and insists on a mild sharpen of the resulting image.
Under the hood you'll find the blazingly fast [libvips](https://github.com/jcupitt/libvips) image processing library, originally created in 1989 at Birkbeck College and currently maintained by the University of Southampton. Speed is typically 25-30% faster than the imagemagick equivalent.
Under the hood you'll find the blazingly fast [libvips](https://github.com/jcupitt/libvips) image processing library, originally created in 1989 at Birkbeck College and currently maintained by the University of Southampton.
Speed is typically 4x faster than the imagemagick equivalent.
## Prerequisites
@@ -26,7 +28,7 @@ Ubuntu 12.04 LTS:
sudo ln -s /usr/lib/pkgconfig/vips-7.26.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/vips.pc
Ubuntu 13.04:
Ubuntu 13.04 (64-bit):
sudo ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/vips-7.28.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/vips.pc
@@ -36,28 +38,59 @@ Ubuntu 13.04:
## Usage
var sharp = require("sharp");
### crop(inputPath, outputPath, width, height, callback)
Scale and crop JPEG `inputPath` to `width` x `height` and write JPEG to `outputPath` calling `callback` when complete.
Example:
```javascript
var sharp = require("sharp");
sharp.crop("input.jpg", "output.jpg", 300, 200, function(err) {
if (err) {
throw err;
}
// output.jpg is cropped input.jpg
// output.jpg is a 300 pixels wide and 200 pixels high image
// containing a scaled and cropped version of input.jpg
});
```
### embedWhite(inputPath, outputPath, width, height, callback)
Scale and embed JPEG `inputPath` to `width` x `height` using a white canvas and write JPEG to `outputPath` calling `callback` when complete.
```javascript
sharp.embedWhite("input.jpg", "output.jpg", 200, 300, function(err) {
if (err) {
throw err;
}
// output.jpg contains input.jpg embedded with a white border
// output.jpg is a 300 pixels wide and 200 pixels high image
// containing a scaled version of input.jpg embedded on a white canvas
});
```
### embedBlack(inputPath, outputPath, width, height, callback)
Scale and embed JPEG `inputPath` to `width` x `height` using a black canvas and write JPEG to `outputPath` calling `callback` when complete.
```javascript
sharp.embedBlack("input.jpg", "output.jpg", 200, 300, function(err) {
if (err) {
throw err;
}
// output.jpg contains input.jpg embedded with a black border
// output.jpg is a 300 pixels wide and 200 pixels high image
// containing a scaled version of input.jpg embedded on a black canvas
});
```
## Testing [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/lovell/sharp.png?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/lovell/sharp)
npm test
## Performance
Using an AMD Athlon quad core CPU with 512KB L2 cache clocked at 3.3GHz with 8GB RAM:
* imagemagick x 5.55 ops/sec <20>0.68% (31 runs sampled)
* sharp x 24.49 ops/sec <20>6.85% (64 runs sampled)